Maps

A Wyandotte County District Court judge ruled Monday that the Ad Astra 2 congressional maps are unconstitutional, tossing out the Kansas legislature's ...

“Ad Astra 2 has high levels of racial dislocation,” Klapper concluded, relying on Rodden’s analysis. "The way this Ad Astra 2 map was drawn, it would have disenfranchised individuals in northern Wyandotte County by including them in a very rural district," Rep. Stephanie Clayton, a Democrat on the House Committee on Redistricting, said. By moving half of Wyandotte County to the 2nd District, while also scooping Lawrence from the 2nd District and placing it in the heavily rural and Republican 1st District, the legislature passed a map that “leans so strongly Republican that the notes of Democratic-leaning and minority residents from Wyandotte are diluted to practical electoral irrelevance.” The court found an expert’s testimony regarding the partisan nature of the Ad Astra changes in terms of population, partisanship and geographical compactness to provide “powerful evidence that Ad Astra 2 is an intentional, effective partisan gerrymander ... designed specifically to provide Republicans with the most advantageous congressional map possible.” University of Michigan Political Science Professor and redistricting expert Dr. Jowei Chen’s analysis determined that Ad Astra’s treatment of the Kansas City area “was an extreme partisan outlier” in those districts and statewide, especially with respect to Shawnee and Lawrence as well as Topeka. "We are where we knew we'd be. Scott Schwab, and Susan Frick, et al, vs. “The Court has no difficulty finding, as a factual matter, that Ad Astra 2 is an intentional, effective pro-Republican gerrymander that systemically dilutes the votes of Democratic Kansans,” Klapper wrote. He ruled that Ad Astra 2 violates the equal protection clause of the Kansas Constitution by depriving “voters of substantially equal voting power.” Wyandotte County District Court Judge Bill Klapper issued a 209-page decision that found Ad Astra 2 unconstitutionally violates the plaintiffs’ collective rights through intentional and effective partisan gerrymandering as well as the intentional and effective dilution of minority voting rights in Wyandotte County. Scott Schwab, Tom Alonzo, et al, vs. KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A Wyandotte County District Court judge ruled Monday that the Ad Astra 2 congressional maps are unconstitutional, tossing out the Kansas legislature’s attempt to split Wyandotte County and move Lawrence into a different congressional district.

Kansas redistricting means new boundaries in 2022 for congressional districts, state legislature districts and state board of education districts.

Please note that this map is likely to change, pending the outcome of the ongoing lawsuit. After being signed by the governor, state legislative maps must be approved by the state Supreme Court. The court is not required to weigh in on congressional or state Board of Education maps unless someone sues to challenge them. The changes reflect how the population of Kansas has changed over the past decade. In the Senate, redistricting plan Liberty 3 forces two pairs of incumbents against each other, leaving two seats up for grabs in the next Senate election in November 2024. The attorney general will then send it back to the court, which has 10 days to respond. In Kansas, the public may also submit maps for consideration with the support and sponsorship from a lawmaker. In the past 10 years, Kansas’ population grew nearly 3%, compared to over 7% for the nation as a whole. After passing through the Kansas Legislature, electoral maps must be approved by the governor. “The courts and the legislature have established case law and criteria on how to draw Kansas districts fairly and constitutionally.” The high-stakes, yearslong process creates maps that will shape the state’s political landscape for 10 years. On April 15, Gov. Laura Kelly signed three new redistricting maps, sending them to the Kansas Supreme Court for final approval. Update: On April 25, Wyandotte County District Judge Bill Klapper ruled that a map setting new boundaries for the state’s four congressional districts is unconstitutional.

A lower court in Kansas threw out the state's GOP-friendly congressional map on Monday and ordered the state legislature back to the drawing board as the ...

"The Court has no difficulty finding, as a factual matter, that Ad Astra 2 is an intentional, effective pro-Republican gerrymander that systemically dilutes the votes of Democratic Kansans," he wrote. He ordered the new map be drawn "expeditiously" in a 209-page ruling for the Wyandotte County District Court. The new map, known as Ad Astra 2, would have likely put the Democrats' sole congressional seat in the state at risk. The suit, Alonzo, et al. Alas, the rub becomes what is right. Republicans will likely face an uphill legal battle if they seek to appeal the decision to the Democratic-controlled state Supreme Court.

A judge in Wyandotte County ruled that new, legislatively drawn congressional maps violate the rights of Kansans.

The Republican-drawn map intentionally split strongholds of Democratic and Black voters, a judge ruled. The State Supreme Court will review the decision.

Judge Klapper waxed lyrical in the first pages of his ruling, citing an anthem about the moral strength of the residents of “the flat plains of Kansas” and musing on the meaning of democracy. It’s the redrawing of the boundaries of congressional and state legislative districts. Should it be upheld, it would in all likelihood keep intact the existing partisan balance in the state’s House delegation, which consists of three Republicans and one Democrat. The final impact on the political balance in the closely divided House of Representatives, however, remains unknown. It happens every 10 years, after the census, to reflect changes in population. It was not immediately clear whether Republicans in the Kansas Legislature would take that path. They called Judge Klapper a partisan Democrat and said he had sided with Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat, “to usurp lawfully enacted maps approved by a supermajority of the people’s representatives.” The Republican-drawn map intentionally split strongholds of Democratic and Black voters, a judge ruled. A state court reinstated a Republican-leaning map in Ohio after a federal court intervened, and challenges in state courts to the Democratic gerrymander in New York and a new Republican gerrymander in Florida have yet to be resolved. The Kansas decision was the first in the state to reject a political map on partisan grounds. Ms. Kelly had vetoed the congressional map after Republican supermajorities in the State House and State Senate approved it in late January. The Legislature overrode the veto, and the A.C.L.U. of Kansas and the Campaign Legal Center sued in the district court, in Kansas City, to block the map. The Kansas ruling follows a flurry of state court decisions striking down partisan gerrymanders of congressional maps, largely in reaction to a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that barred federal courts from addressing the issue.

Wyandotte County District Judge Bill Klapper rules a new congressional map drawn by Kansas Republicans violates the state Constitution.

We look forward to the Attorney General’s appeal of this erroneous decision.” Republicans drew a map that divides the Kansas City metro along Interstate 70, separating a diverse community in the northern part of Wyandotte County from the 3rd District, making it more difficult for the state’s only Democrat in Congress, U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids, to win reelection. The ruling follows a consolidated trial for three lawsuits that were filed in response to a new congressional map passed by the Legislature this session. “The state is promptly appealing.” Federal courts previously handled these disputes, until a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2019 determined federal courts should have no say on the topic. Klapper’s order, which Attorney General Derek Schmidt immediately appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court, blocks the state from preparing for the congressional election until a new map is drawn.

The Republican-drawn map intentionally split strongholds of Democratic and Black voters, a judge ruled. The State Supreme Court will review the decision.

Judge Klapper waxed lyrical in the first pages of his ruling, citing an anthem about the moral strength of the residents of “the flat plains of Kansas” and musing on the meaning of democracy. It’s the redrawing of the boundaries of congressional and state legislative districts. Should it be upheld, it would in all likelihood keep intact the existing partisan balance in the state’s House delegation, which consists of three Republicans and one Democrat. The final impact on the political balance in the closely divided House of Representatives, however, remains unknown. It happens every 10 years, after the census, to reflect changes in population. It was not immediately clear whether Republicans in the Kansas Legislature would take that path. They called Judge Klapper a partisan Democrat and said he had sided with Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat, “to usurp lawfully enacted maps approved by a supermajority of the people’s representatives.” The Republican-drawn map intentionally split strongholds of Democratic and Black voters, a judge ruled. A state court reinstated a Republican-leaning map in Ohio after a federal court intervened, and challenges in state courts to the Democratic gerrymander in New York and a new Republican gerrymander in Florida have yet to be resolved. The Kansas decision was the first in the state to reject a political map on partisan grounds. Ms. Kelly had vetoed the congressional map after Republican supermajorities in the State House and State Senate approved it in late January. The Legislature overrode the veto, and the A.C.L.U. of Kansas and the Campaign Legal Center sued in the district court, in Kansas City, to block the map. The Kansas ruling follows a flurry of state court decisions striking down partisan gerrymanders of congressional maps, largely in reaction to a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that barred federal courts from addressing the issue.

Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt filed a petition Monday with the Kansas Supreme Court asking for the approval of the state legislative district maps.

The court has a 30 day time limit to make the decision. "In addition to handling the legislative maps, Schmidt’s office has been defending against separate legal challenges brought by parties dissatisfied with the recently enacted new boundaries for the four congressional districts," the release said. "The new legislative district boundaries appear to satisfy all legal requirements previously established by state constitutional, statutory or common law," Schmidt said in a release.

A Wyandotte County judge struck down a set of GOP-authored Congressional maps enacted earlier this year and ordered the legislature pass new lines.

“We are thankful that Judge Klapper saw this map for what it was – a deliberate attempt to silence the political voices of Democratic and minority Kansans,” Sharon Brett, the ACLU of Kansas' legal director, said in a statement. The ACLU of Kansas, one of several parties to bring the lawsuits, cheered the ruling in a statement, though they acknowledged the reality that it will now head to the Kansas Supreme Court. "When the Kansas Legislature violates the Kansas Constitution, including in its enactment of congressional redistricting legislation, Kansas courts have the power and duty to exercise judicial review and invalidate the Legislature’s unconstitutional action," Klapper wrote. But he invoked a speech from federal Judge Learned Hand in saying that "Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women." In his ruling, Klapper echoed that sentiment when he wrote the maps "intentionally and effectively dilutes minority votes in violation of the Kansas Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection." Wyandotte County District Court Judge Bill Klapper called the maps passed over the veto of Gov. Laura Kelly earlier this year to be "motivated at least in part by an intent to dilute minority voting strength" and said the state courts had the right to take up redistricting cases.

A Kansas judge struck down the state's new Republican-drawn congressional maps on Monday as an unconstitutional gerrymander, but conservative legislators ...

In 2019, the court found that the state constitution includes the right to an abortion — a hugely consequential decision given the erosion of abortion rights at the federal level. “We’re not really going to have time to have a bunch of political posturing. But the decision announced Monday, following a four-day trial earlier this month, is guaranteed to be appealed to the state Supreme Court. “It’s part of the process,” Croft said. It would be a critical decision coming as federal courts have stopped ruling against political gerrymandering. The Supreme Court’s ultimate decision will be one of its most momentous in recent years because the court may interpret the state constitution to prohibit political and racial gerrymandering.

It was the first time a court has declared that the Kansas Constitution prohibits political gerrymandering. The state is expected to appeal to the Kansas ...

The state constitution requires a decision by June 5. It was the first time a court has declared that the Kansas Constitution prohibits political gerrymandering. But the state’s attorneys also argued that nothing in the Kansas Constitution allows state courts — rather than federal courts — to review congressional maps or to consider political gerrymandering as an issue. It was the first time a court has declared that the Kansas Constitution prohibits political gerrymandering. The state argued that Davids’ district emerged slightly more competitive than it had been. “Strong enough to expect nothing more than a level playing field devoid of partisan advantage for one group of Kansans. Strong enough for the merits of the issue to be the deciding factor.

The Buckeye State is stuck in a Sisyphean cycle of court fights over gerrymandered maps, despite past reform.

“The Republicans will argue that they now have more districts that are a little bit closer and up in the air but if you look at the numbers it’s not really true. In Alaska, control of the House is in the hands of a coalition. “There remains an aggregate asymmetry in the assignment of toss-up districts, demonstrating partisan bias,” the opinion reads. “Nonpartisan redistricting commissions are a very popular idea,” Kevin Kosar, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute told The Dispatch. “The real trick obviously, as we saw in Ohio, is how do you achieve it? “The states that have done less well are states that have tried to effectively build half a bridge from control by the politically motivated legislature to control an independent body—states like New Mexico, Virginia, Ohio, New Jersey, New York all did some version of a half of a bridge. Lawsuits resulted, and the state Supreme Court struck down the maps in a 4-3 ruling. (That’s just a comparison of the partisan lean of the seats, the analysis notes. While some of the map remains unsettled, FiveThirtyEight predicted that this cycle of mapmaking could result in the fewest swing districts since 1996 “What we’ve seen happen in 2021 and 2022 is not what [voters] had in mind.” University of Akron political science professor David Brian Cohen told The Dispatch. “They’ve gotten a process which has been completely dominated by the majority party. And the penalties for not passing fair maps—having to redo the work in four years—carries little threat. But the legislative races for the Ohio Senate and Ohio House of Representatives, as well as some other local races, must wait to appear on a second primary ballot later in the year, once the legislative maps are finalized. The second primary will cost the state millions of dollars.

COLUMBUS — The Republican majority on the Ohio Redistricting Commission appears to be in no hurry to comply with the Ohio Supreme Court's latest order that ...

Cupp spokesman Aaron Mulvey said the speaker had spoken with Mr. Sykes on Friday and indicated that Monday would not work for a meeting. It suggested the commission continue along that path. “This commission's work is absolutely not over, in spite of what the federal court has ordered,” she said. “Ten days are gone since the court order,” Mr. Sykes said. They needed a third member to side with them to officially call the meeting. A federal three-judge panel has already said it will step in on May 28 if new maps aren't approved.

On this episode of Rewind, Emilee and JR review the recent Wisconsin State Supreme Court decision which a 4-3 majority found insufficient evidence to draw ...

GOP legislative maps give Republicans a clear path to two-thirds majority in Senate. However, it gets trickier on how to get to seat Number 66 in the Assembly. Nonetheless, the federal case still alive, though Republicans recently asked the court to dismiss it while the Dems want more time. The GOP maps are race neutral, comply with the Equal Protection Clause, meet other standards and adhere to an earlier directive from the court to make “minimal changes to the existing maps” that Republicans drew in 2011. On this episode of Rewind, Emilee and JR review the recent Wisconsin State Supreme Court decision which a 4-3 majority found insufficient evidence to draw state legislative districts on the basis of race and said other proposals that had been submitted to the court were racially motivated.

One of the leaders of the Ohio Redistricting Commission was in town Monday afternoon to attend a fundraiser in Warren.

It was the first time a court has declared that the Kansas Constitution prohibits political gerrymandering. Kansas State Capitol Building.

The state’s attorneys also argued that nothing in the Kansas Constitution allows state courts — rather than federal courts — to review congressional maps or to consider political gerrymandering as an issue. Klapper ruled in three consolidated lawsuits filed by a voting rights group, Loud Light, and 20 voters in the Kansas City and Lawrence areas. State Rep. Barbara Ballard, a Lawrence Democrat, jumped up and down with joy in a Statehouse elevator when she learned of the ruling. The state argued that Davids’ district emerged slightly more competitive than it had been. It was the first time a court has declared that the Kansas Constitution prohibits political gerrymandering. He ordered legislators to draft another map after declaring that the challenged one not only was too partisan but diluted minority voters’ political clout.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has signed into law a gerrymandered voting map that virtually guarantees Republicans four more seats in Congress while likely ...

But what they’re doing is dangerous and can have long-lasting effect on the state and in this country. This is to push the judicial system to the limit, all the way to the Supreme Court, which I believe is not only dangerous for the state but is dangerous for our democracy. And I think a lot of this, what we’re seeing, Amy, is all of this is just a distraction. It is racist tactics that is happening all across this country, that Republicans, they see that they are in distress, and they are going to great lengths to take power away from marginalized people, to pick on marginalized people. Now, I will say that the House Democrats and how they — and what they’ve done, they made clear that if they are going to make laws like 1960, they will protest like it’s 1960. The Republicans cannot continue to disenfranchise Black voters, disenfranchise and take our voices away from us, and expect nothing to bring attention to what’s happening in Florida. If we can’t win inside the chambers, we have to bring attention one way or another. We are the people! We are the people! The people’s house! The people’s house! The people’s house! “Republicans cannot continue to disenfranchise Black voters,” says state Senator Shevrin Jones, a Democratic member of Florida’s Legislative Black Caucus who took part in the protest and who calls the gerrymandering part of a larger suite of “racist tactics” enacted by Republicans across the country.

A new congressional map that splits St. Petersburg voters, with downtown and the city's east side joining Tampa Rep. Kathy Castor's District 14, is now being ...

DeSantis believes maps should be “race-neutral,” and that drawing districts to protect minority representation under the Fair Districts amendments violates the equal protection clause in the U.S. Constitution – which supersedes state law. DeSantis appointed three of the replacements. The state Legislature’s maps complied with federal and state laws, but the governor followed through on his promise to veto those maps. “I look forward to this unconstitutional, partisan and illegal map being overturned in court.” Some African American legislators began a sit-in and revealed shirts demanding to “Stop the Black Attack.” The new map jumps the bay, combining parts of Castor’s 14th District with the east side of St. Peterburg, which includes downtown and midtown.

The popularity of mobile navigation apps such as Google Maps and Waze has skyrocketed in the last few years, making pre-loaded navigation software installed ...

The whole thing, however, is a lot more complex, as it can keep an eye on traffic conditions, the destination you’re about to use, the typical departure time, and so on. This time, the purpose is as simple as it could be. The whole thing, however, is a lot more complex, as it can keep an eye on traffic conditions, the destination you’re about to use, the typical departure time, and so on.

The last time the GOP Legislature passed an illegal gerrymander, my dad David King represented the League of Women Voters of Florida as they led the charge ...

Voting Rights groups are suing Florida over congressional maps that eliminate two Black voting districts. Even if successful, it's uncertain whether new ...

You may click on “Your Choices” below to learn about and use cookie management tools to limit use of cookies when you visit NPR’s sites. If you click “Agree and Continue” below, you acknowledge that your cookie choices in those tools will be respected and that you otherwise agree to the use of cookies on NPR’s sites. NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites (together, “cookies”) to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic.

HOWLAND — With less than a month to come up with a fifth set of legislative district maps, House Speaker and Ohio Redistricting Commission co-chair Bob Cupp ...

Cupp said he is hopeful and optimistic that there will still be a good voter turnout based on the candidates’ resourcefulness in generating voter interest. He said this is the first time Ohio has gone through this process and it has been “more complicated and taken longer than anyone expected.” Cupp said the federal court has weighed in and ensured a second primary election to include the state general assembly.

One of the leaders of the Ohio Redistricting Commission was in town Monday afternoon to attend a fundraiser in Warren.