Correctional Services

2022 - 12 - 17

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Eyewitness News"

Correctional Services Commissioner takes Zuma medical parole ... (Eyewitness News)

Last month, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) by and large upheld a previous ruling by the Pretoria High Court, that former commissioner Arthur Fraser's ...

In support of having the apex court consider the matter, Thobakgale says in the department’s papers that the case raises a constitutional issue. But a Constitutional Court hearing is not the Commissioner’s for the taking - he has to motivate for it. JOHANNESBURG - The National Commissioner of Correctional Services has taken the fight to keep former president Jacob Zuma out of prison, to the Constitutional Court.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Daily Maverick"

Correctional Services commissioner questions courts' integrity over ... (Daily Maverick)

Department of Correctional Services national commissioner Makgothi Thobakgale says returning Jacob Zuma to prison would be 'cruel'.

The statement by the MPAB to the effect that Mr JG Zuma was stable and does not qualify for medical parole is misguided,” said Thobakgale. He further said the MPAB makes no mention that Zuma is “not terminally ill or that he is not physically incapacitated”. In their rulings, both the high court and the SCA ordered Zuma back to Estcourt Correctional Centre. “This amounts to double jeopardy and a complete travesty of justice. The medical diagnosis is done by the medical practitioner examining the offender and not the board,” said Thobakgale. [15-months’ imprisonment for contempt of court](https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-06-29-lady-justice-thunders-at-zuma-as-former-head-of-state-sentenced-to-15-months-without-option-of-an-appeal/) for failing to appear before the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into State Capture. He further said that even if Fraser had made a mistake, returning Zuma to prison now would be “cruel” and amount to “double jeopardy”. Thobakgale’s affidavit appeared to be crafted to deliberately undermine the parole board’s authority. “While the recommendation of the board is important, it is not binding on the National Commissioner as the Act confers discretion on the National Commissioner in the consideration of the application for the placement of an offender on medical parole,” said Thobakgale. It only considers the reports of the medical experts submitted and makes a recommendation to the National Commissioner on whether the diagnosis made in the reports satisfy (sic) the requirements for [medical parole]. He said the MPAB had been “misguided” in its assessment of Zuma in reaching a conclusion that he did not qualify for medical parole. A key component of both the high court and the SCA rulings was that the Medical Parole Advisory Board (MPAB) empowered by the Correctional Services Act to assess whether an inmate qualifies for medical parole or not, had found that Zuma did not qualify.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "SowetanLIVE"

National commissioner appeals Zuma parole ruling in ConCourt (SowetanLIVE)

Commissioner Makgothi Thobakgale said the decision to send Zuma back to jail was alarmingly inhumane and insensitive and that parole was a form of ...

He said the board did not express this but had said his treatment had been optimized and all conditions brought under control, that he was stable and did not qualify for medical parole, according to the South African Correctional Services Act. Thobakgale, in his appeal application, says the Pretoria High Court had been wrong to find that the board had concluded that while Zuma suffered from multiple comorbidities, he was not terminally ill or physically incapacitated. The court also found that on his own version, the commissioner’s decision was unlawful because he took into account irrelevant factors — Zuma’s age and the unrest following his incarceration.

Explore the last week