Jeremy Clarkson

The diatribe against Meghan shows how low the rightwing media is willing to go, writes Guardian columnist Zoe Williams.

He would have us believe that he’s merely returning to a freer, more honest time, when blokes could be blokes in the pages of newspapers, without the threat of “cancellation”. All that matters is that a hate figure has been created, a shortcut, a shibboleth, a means by which bigots can identify one another and give voice to their prejudice, without fear of censure. It’s all so obvious, that’s what is galling: an obvious bid to sow division, to spur hatred, to justify misogynistic fantasies under the cover of a splenetic royalism, to dress up hate speech as fair comment. The dominant value system of the British rightwing press made [her life unliveable](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/dec/15/prince-william-bullied-sussexes-royal-duties-harry-meghan) in this country, in a concrete and demonstrable way. Harry and Meghan, furthermore, have become the human targets of a set of bellicose but quite abstract assertions: take your equality, your cultural sensitivities, your respect, tolerance, humanity, take it all and shove it. [own daughter](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/12/18/clarkson-criticised-daughter-saying-megan-markle-should-paraded/) to be among his opponents?

Americans got to know Jeremy Clarkson as the face of Top Gear, but not the Top Gear that had existed since the 1970s. We only ever got the megahit Top Gear, ...

The angry critic angle only works when the critic has something unique to say; in so many of these columns, Clarkson has joined the existing chorus of these papers in his own mismatched voice. The tone is familiar to anyone who knows Clarkson's work, joke formats you'd recognize from any Top Gear essay mixed in with a certainty that he knows better than you. That was the theme for almost the entire run of the show; Top Gear would not be Top Gear without Clarkson's ability to effortlessly move between the poetic and the crass, but his process somehow always seemed to come with either making someone else angry or getting angry himself. [short-lived talk show](https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/a14480859/jeremy-clarkson-talk-show/), they trusted him to revive the once-valuable Top Gear brand in his own image and stood by that version of the show for 13 years. We only ever got the megahit Top Gear, the one re-oriented around Clarkson as a sort of hour-long homage to car culture in general years after the end of its time as a British MotorWeek. Americans got to know Jeremy Clarkson as the face of Top Gear, but not the Top Gear that had existed since the 1970s.

The Sun published a column by Jeremy Clarkson on Friday in which The Grand Tour host wrote he "hate[s]" Meghan Markle "on a cellular level".

In a column I wrote about Meghan, I made a clumsy reference to a scene in Game of Thrones and this has gone down badly with a great many people. In a column I wrote about Meghan, I made a clumsy reference to a scene in Game of Thrones and this has gone down badly with a great many people." Elsewhere, Prince Harry claims Prince William's office gave a former aide of the couple, who stayed on with William and Kate, the go-ahead to testify for Associated Newspaper in Meghan Markle's legal battle against them. It is a blatant appeal to incite humiliation and violence on a woman. I’m horrified to have caused so much hurt and I shall be more careful in future.— Jeremy Clarkson (@JeremyClarkson) I've rather put my foot in it.

Queen Camilla reportedly had lunch with columnist Jeremy Clarkson just days before his viral, hate-filled Meghan Markle article.

The timing of Clarkson piece coming after Queen Camilla's lunch is certainly brow-raising, since the royals haven't said one word about Meghan and Harry's docuseries themselves. After spewing a bunch of hate (which we won't be repeating) about Meghan, Jeremy said “Everyone who’s my age thinks the same way.” The event was held in central London and was a "purely private" affair, which happened to take place one day before the second installment of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Netflix docuseries dropped.

LONDON — (AP) — British television presenter Jeremy Clarkson said Monday he is “horrified to have caused so much hurt” with a scathing column about Prince ...

Clarkson’s column followed the release of a six-part Netflix documentary about Harry and Meghan’s acrimonious split from the British royal family. Clarkson, who made his name as the combative host of the BBC car show “Top Gear,” said the public shaming image was “a clumsy reference” to a scene in “Game of Thrones.” Clarkson, who hosts motoring show “The Grand Tour” on Amazon, wrote in tabloid newspaper The Sun that he hated the former Meghan Markle “on a cellular level” and dreamed of her being paraded naked through British towns “while the crowds chant ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her.”

Jeremy Clarkson has said he is “horrified to have caused so much hurt” following backlash over comments he made in a newspaper column about how he “hated” ...

“My views are and have always been clear when it comes to misogyny, bullying and the treatment of women by the media,” she said, in a statement shared on her Instagram story. A spokesperson for Ipso told the PA news agency that the regulator had received over 6,000 complaints about Clarkson’s article as of midday on Monday, and that the number was subject to change. “So maybe he just needs to take a step back from things and just think about life a bit more.” Jeremy Clarkson has said he is “horrified to have caused so much hurt” following backlash over comments he made in a newspaper column about how he “hated” the Duchess of Sussex. The first three episodes saw Meghan accuse the British media of wanting to “destroy” her and claim “salacious” stories were “planted” by the press. In the Netflix show the Duke of Sussex claimed his wife had suffered a miscarriage due to the stress of the long-running lawsuit.

British television presenter Jeremy Clarkson said on Monday he was "horrified to have caused so much hurt" after a column he wrote in the Sun newspaper ...

In a column I wrote about Meghan, I made a clumsy reference to a scene in Game of Thrones and this has gone down badly with a great many people." In a column published on Friday, Clarkson, who gained worldwide fame as presenter of motoring show "Top Gear", wrote of Meghan: "I hate her. Register for free to Reuters and know the full story

Jeremy Clarkson, a columnist for 'The Sun,' faced backlash for his racist, misogynistic column about Meghan Markle, in which he wrote, “I hate her on a ...

In response, some criticized The Sun for allowing the column to be published in the first place and called for Clarkson to be fired. In a separate post, she wrote that she believes the media’s treatment of Meghan has been unfair. The luncheon was reportedly attended by British celebrities including Judi Dench and Maggie Smith as well as media personalities and commentators including Morgan and Clarkson. Misinformation about Camilla’s involvement swirled, with some claiming she had hosted the event, which has been But apparently, comparing Meghan to a serial killer was not enough; Clarkson went on to share a truly deranged fantasy about harming her. While the usual suspects, like Piers Morgan and Angela Levin, shared their regular hateful thoughts about Meghan, Jeremy Clarkson took the cake for most inappropriate, cruel, and unnecessary commentary.

Clarkson wrote that he hated Markle "on a cellular level" and dreamed of her being paraded naked through British towns "while the crowds chant 'Shame!

Asked about the article, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that "for everyone in public life, language matters." The couple quit royal duties and moved to California in 2020, citing a lack of support from the palace and racist press treatment of Meghan, who is biracial. "Oh dear.

Yet that Clarkson can write such things, and the Sun unashamedly publish them, tells us all we need to know about the acceptance of misogyny and sexism, and this country's weak laws around hate crimes, including those which govern social media sites. The ...

With a regular donation to our monthly Fighting Fund, we can continue to thumb our noses at the fat cats and tell truth to power. The Morning Star is unique, as a lone socialist voice in a sea of corporate media. Instead, there is a pilot scheme in just four locations, which rape survivors cannot select to have their cases heard in. Clarkson’s vile, sexualised comments of dreaming about humiliating Markle, with her being paraded naked through the streets while crowds throw excrement at her, are horrific, dangerous and inexcusable. Misogyny and racism are normalised in this way. One of them, Susan, said: “The comments were racist and misogynistic and represent the worst kind of oppression by powerful white men.”

Cross-party group of MPs say column contributes to 'unacceptable climate of hatred and violence'

This sort of language has no place in our country and it is unacceptable it was allowed to be published in a mainstream newspaper.” but an editorial process allowed his column to be printed unchallenged.” I’m horrified to have caused so much hurt and I shall be more careful in future.”

More than 60 MPs have written to the editor of The Sun to condemn "in the strongest terms" an article by Jeremy Clarkson about the Duchess of Sussex.

Rupert Murdoch's The Sun and British pubcaster ITV are facing pressure from dozens of UK MPs over the Jeremy Clarkson row sparked by the former Top Gear ...

“Ms Markle has faced multiple credible threats to her life, requiring the intervention of the Metropolitan Police,” it said. Any decision made by ITV overe Clarkson’s future would have to be in conjunction with Who Wants to be a Millionaire?‘s Sony-backed producer Stellify Media. The situation has shades of Letters can be seen below in full as UK press regulator IPSO reports the column is now the most complained about article of all time, drawing more than 17,500 complaints as of this morning. “I do not believe that Mr Clarkson should appear on our television screens again,” wrote Nicolson. [ITV](https://deadline.com/tag/itv/) are facing pressure from dozens of UK MPs over the [Jeremy Clarkson](https://deadline.com/tag/jeremy-clarkson/) row sparked by the former [Top Gear](https://deadline.com/tag/top-gear/) host using “violent, misogynistic language” against [Meghan Markle](https://deadline.com/tag/meghan-markle/).

It comes as a letter was signed by a total of 64 MPs after the former Top Gear presenter's "hateful" remarks about the Duchess of Sussex sparked backlash.

In a column I wrote about Meghan, I made a clumsy reference to a scene in Game of Thrones and this has gone down badly with a great many people. Ms Markle has faced multiple credible threats to her life, requiring the intervention of the Metropolitan Police". We cannot allow this type of behaviour to go unchecked any longer." "We are horrified at the recent article by Jeremy Clarkson in your publication. I'm horrified to have caused so much hurt and I shall be more careful in future." "We will follow our usual processes to examine the complaints we have received.

A Sun newspaper column by British television presenter Jeremy Clarkson about Prince Harry's wife Meghan has become the press standards regulator's most ...

We cannot allow this type of behaviour to go unchecked any longer," said the letter, which was posted on Twitter by Nokes. "Enough is enough. In a column published on Friday, Clarkson, who gained worldwide fame as presenter of motoring show "Top Gear", wrote of Meghan: "I hate her.